(Official announcement) Jeonnam-Cheonanjeon is a technical defect, Jeju-Ulsan is orthodox… Judgment Committee final judgment
(Popotu = Park Jin -woo)
The final judgment of the Korean Football Association’s Judgment Committee (hereinafter referred to as the Judgment Committee) came to the controversial scene from the K -League 1 and K -League 2.
The Korea Football Association (KFA) said in a press release on the 14th, “The referee (Chairman Moon Jin-hee) held a referee panel meeting on the afternoon of the 13th and judged the scenes of the K-League 24th round Jeonnam-Cheonanjeon and Jeju-Ulsan.”
The cancellation of the scoring of the Hana Bank K -League 2 2025, which was held at Gwangyang Football Stadium on the 10th, was found to be canceled. At that time, Jeonnam shook the net by finishing the cross from the right side of the 19th minute with a left -footed shooting. However, the referee canceled the goal after communicating with the video reading room for about 5 minutes. In the previous scene, when Kim Yong -hwan passed the pass, he was in the offside position. However, Jung Kang -min was in the on -side position on the broadcast screen. Jeonnam formally filed a decision to KFA and concluded as a coming.
KFA said, “In the state/assistant field decision, it was judged as an onside.In the final VAR reading procedure that finally checked the goal, the goal was canceled. “In the process of checking the on/offside line, a technical problem (which is seen as offside on the read screen) has arisen.”
“The reason for the five -minute time to read was time in the process of repeatedly checking the technical problem of the offside camera.In the scene of the five cameras that can implement offside graphics in Gwangyang football stadium, only one camera was an angle that could be read off -gu. Unlike the Var Collection before the game, the error occurred.
On the 9th, Hana Bank’s K -League 1 2025, 24th round, Jeju SK and Ulsan HD’s scoring, were considered orthodox. In the second half of the 18th minute, Rubicson attempted a right foot shot in the box, and Kim Dong -joon made a good shot and the ball was high. At the moment, Eric flooded and pushed the ball. At the time, Eric was in an offside position, and after VAR, he scored. Rubikson’s refractive shooting crossed the goal line before it reached Eric’s feet.
“In the second half of the 18th minute Eric attempted to play the ball at an offside position, but did not interfere with the goalkeeper Kim Dong -jun, and it was not seen in the goal scene. The situation was objective, not the target of the field review (OFR), and the final decision was made by VAR.”
At the same time, the word ‘objective situation’ is right that the striker (Eric) was in an offside position, but it is not declared offside just because it was offside position. Since it is the role of assistant, Orot acted as a assistant, but the judgment of the assistant was not the final judgment. ”
KFA said it is making efforts to improve referee quality. KFA said, “We are aware of the importance of all games in the ground, regardless of age, league grade, competition, and gender.In particular, the K -League referee has been conducting two weeks of winter training, latter -day conservative education, and monthly conservative training ahead of the season.This year, we have already conducted the second conservative training in July and last 12 days. The K -League referees have already conducted five online lectures by topic from the Sukidin FIFA referee instructor, the senior referee of the Korean Football Association this year, and will provide training in the second half of the year. ”
KFA said, “Despite the efforts to improve the quality of referees, both the Korean Football Association and the members of the referee are accepted with heavy hearts. I will continue to discuss it. ”
By Park Jin -woo, staff reporter jjnooow@fourfourtwo.co.kr
Ⓒ Popotu (unauthorized reproduction and cultivation
