(Official announcement) The Korean Football Association’s Judgment Committee “The cancellation of the scoring of Min Joon -young, Jeonnam, and the recognition of Ulsan Rubicson scoring.”
Photo = Coupang Play Broadcast Screen Capture
(Inter -Football = Judge is a reporter) The Korea Football Association’s Judgment Committee revealed the recent controversial results of the K -League decision.
The Korean Football Association announced on the 14th, “The Judgment Committee held a referee panel meeting on the afternoon of the 13th, and decided that the scene of the Jeonnam-Cheon Safety scorer was nausea and the K-League 1 25th round Ulsan-Jeju.”
The scenes of the K-League 2 24th round Jeonnam and Cheonan Gyeonggi (4-3 Cheonan Win) held at Gwangyang Soccer Stadium on the 10th were coming. In the 19th minute, Min Joon -young scored with a fantastic left -footed shot, but in the previous scene, he was canceled when he judged that he was off -side.
The Korean Football Association explained, “I judged it as an onside in the state/assistant field decision. I read it as an offside in the process of reading VAR reading process.”
“The referees will be conducted before the start of each game, and the VAR Collection Checking is conducted to adjust the accuracy of the measurement (line) in the stadium. In the case of the stadium, unlike the preliminary test, there was a technical problem (appearing as offside on the reading screen) in the process of checking the VAR on/offside line during the game.”
He added, “The reason for the five -minute reading is time in the process of repeatedly checking with the technical problem of the offside camera.”
The Korean Football Association said, “In the scene of the five cameras that can be implemented off -range graphics in Gwangyang Soccer Stadium, only one camera was an angle that could be read offside.The situation was implemented through this camera, unlike the VAR Curlement before the game, and the VAR room was seen on the screen. After the on/off -ide decision, the referee accepted it and canceled it. ”
Photo = Korean Football Association
On the other hand, the K-League 1 25th round Ulsan and Jeju Gyeonggi (1-0 Ulsan Seung-seung) held at the Munsu Stadium in Ulsan on the 9th were judged to be orthodox. Eric reached out after Rubikson’s shooting in the second half of the 18th minute, but Rubicson’s shooting was recognized as a score of Rubikson as he crossed the goal line. Since Eric was an offside position, there was a controversy over whether or not to score.
The Korean Football Association said, “In the second half of the 18th minute, Ulsan’s 97th player (Eric) attempted to play the ball at the offside position, but it did not interfere with the GK of Jeju, and it was not gained from the goal scene. The situation was not subject to the field review (OFR), and it was finally decided that the contents of the VAR were finally decided.”
“It is true that the attacker was in the offside position, but it was not declared as an offside just because it was offside position. It is also determined to be off -side when the attacker receives a ball or gains from the offside position. The judgment of the assistant is not the final judgment. ”
The Korean Football Association said, “In spite of the efforts to improve the quality of referees, both the Korean Football Association and the referee are accepted with heavy hearts. I will continue to discuss it. ”
