Jeonnam-Cheon Safety, Ulsan-Jeju Exhibition, etc.
(Star News | Reporter Kim Myung -seok)
The Korean Football Association’s Judgment Committee Meeting last June. /Photo = Korean Football Association YouTube video capture
The Korea Football Association’s Judgment Committee will hold a meeting last weekend, K -League 2 Jeonnam Dragons, Cheonan City, K -League 1 Ulsan HD and Jeju SK.
According to the Korea Football Association, the Association’s Judgment Committee confirms the major decisions last weekend at the professional evaluation panel meeting from 2 pm on the 13th. The results of the meeting are expected to come after 4 pm.
The meeting is a weekly meeting after the K -League, but there are clubs that have formally challenged for the match last weekend.
Previously, the Jeonnam FC made an objection to Min Joon -young’s scoring scenes that were canceled offside in the Cheonan City Exhibition held at Gwangyang Football Stadium on the 10th.
At the time, Min Joon -young shook his opponent’s net with a left -footed mid -range shot, and at the time, the referee decided to cancel the score due to the off -side of Jung Kang -min after a long communication with the video reading trials (VAR).
However, at the time, Jung Kang -min was clearly controversial because it seemed clearly behind the Cheonan defender, and the Jeonnam -do was formally filed with the association’s referee committee.
The moment when Jeonnam Dragons and Hana Bank’s K -League 2 2025 Round, Jeonnam Kim Yong -hwan passed to Jung Kang -min (bottom red square), held at the Gwangyang Stadium on the 10th. After more than five minutes of video reading, the judge canceled Jeonnam scoring from the situation because he was off. The top red square is the final defender of Cheonan City. /Photo = Broadcasting screen capture
In addition to this scene, Jeonnam FC has been challenged by the fact that Jung Kang -min has been injured enough to be replaced by his opponent’s elbow and has been replaced by the opponent, and the game has been completed for a long time due to an 8 -minute video reading during an 8 -minute additional time.
The Jeju team filed an objection even if it was the winning goal from Ulsan-Jeju day before the debut of Ulsan.
At that time, when Ulsan Rubikson’s shooting was hit by Kim Dong -jun’s hand and floated high, Eric flooded toward the ball and pushed it to the toe. Eric’s position was offside.
However, after the video reading, the score was recognized. Eric was in an offside position, but VAR judgment was that the ball crossed the goal line before the ball touched the ball.
The opinion was greatly mixed with this decision. As Eric flooded with the door and influenced Kim Dong -jun’s goalkeeper play, it is an atmosphere of the opinion that the ball is overwhelming, and if the ball has crossed the goal line, the scoring recognition is correct.
Rubikson’s goal scene that caused controversial. /Photo = relay screen capture
In particular, the scene led to another controversy in that the referee did not review field reviews and listened to the opinion of the VAR judgment office and decided to finalize the final decision. At that time, the assistant declared offside, and some pointed out that VAR referees should have made the final results through field reviews as much as they overturned this decision.
Even in the midst of such controversial controversy, the results of the Korean Football Association’s referee evaluation meeting and the background of judgment are not officially announced at the football association level. The Football Association once unveiled the results of the subcommittee of the referee evaluation every week, but it has been maintaining this policy for many years after a private turn.
Recently, the video content VAR on, which was promoted as a new window, may be used as a new window. However, this is not updated for more than a month since the first video released on the 2nd of last month.
By Kim Myung -seok, reporter elcrack@mtstarnews.com
