Abedini: Hashemian is original to protect him / Parvin never understand the manager’s duties

Amir Abedini, former Persepolis CEO, said about Vahid Hashemian’s selection: Hashemian is one of the most characteristic players in Iranian football history with a strange authenticity in ethics and culture, which is very respected.

A detailed interview with Abedini, who has repeatedly emphasized the protection and protection of Vahid Hashemian.

If I am not mistaken, in recent days and weeks you have no reaction to the choice of Persepolis coach. I want to know what you think about Vahid Hashemian?

(Pause a little) I defined the style and style of the new Persepolis coach before choosing Vahid Hashemian. I said that the technical committee had to take out of the four, five existing options, review and take the best to the board of directors and approve its choice. On the other hand, public opinion should not be ignored in the choice. Fans have to say their opinion, and this could be done with a poll.

Your talk is that one thinks you do not agree with the Hashemian choice.

I talked about the type of choice, but Vahid Hashemian is not one who is unknown in Iranian football. One of the most specific players in the history of Iranian football, which has a strange authenticity in ethics and culture, which is very respected. The team he chose is also very good. The members of his technical staff are both technically and managerial, and I believe that Vahid can be successful. This in the middle only I have a concern.

Worry? In what case? You who praised Hashemian…

(Laughs) I have an important concern and it is my duty to say. Vahid Hashemian and his technical staff are a young team who must sit on a big bench. It is very heavy this bench. Zamani Alan Rogers, Mansour Amir Asafi, Ali Parvin, Hamid Derakhshan, Stankoko, Mattcovic, Jurgen Gadd, Branco and other elders were on the Persepolis bench, whose class and management were defined to everyone. It is true that I consider Karim Bagheri to be a weighty in Persepolis technical staff that is respected to everyone, but let’s not forget that Hashemian is young and inexperienced.

I apologize for cutting off your word. I want to know exactly what your concern is? Hashemian’s youthful and young?

That’s. We all know that football has special and critical moments. The team gets 4 people at once, the player is injured, the team scores, and all sorts of other things happen. It is at this time that you need to be well organized, change tactics, and many more. I don’t know what Hashemian will do at this time; I just hope it is successful and our job is to help it. Hashemian is very friendly in the sporting system of the country, and I believe that neither the fan, the CEO nor the Board of Directors should not rush about him and give Hashemian and his staff a chance.

Let’s give our discussion a bit. You talked about the great concern that may be a concern for Persepolis fans. On the other hand, you praised Vahid Hashemian’s choice. This was two different theories. Was the Hashemian selection right now, when coaches such as Yahya Golmohammadi, Mehdi Tartar and even Branko Ivanovich were the option?

This is another discussion. You asked me about Vahid Hashemian. If you ask, for example, Mehdi Tartar or Vahid Hashemian, I would say Tartar. Well, if Tartar came and chosen it, my concern would definitely be less. Because he has experience, technical knows his work and has been in the Iranian league for many years. Today, however, we have to support Vahid Hashemian. It has been made and our job is to say what can help the Hashemians without fear. Not only Vahid, but also other young coaches such as Maziar Zare, Qassim Haddifar, Muharram Navidkia, and so on. I am not only concerned about Hashemian, I have the concern of all these young coaches who have to make the future of our football. Their job is hard, but our expectation should be such that they have the opportunity to provide their abilities.

There is another important discussion about Persepolis …

What discussion?

Hamid Steele’s resignation from membership in the Technical Committee.

The Technical Committee has duties. He has to check the various coaching options, make suggestions for the login and exit list, and then work out.

But the main issue was the lack of consultation. Steele has insisted that they have not taken advisory technical committee.

Hamid Steele may not be a good coach, but he understands football well. It is respectable and sympathetic to Persepolis. A short period that went to February was still with Persepolis. Darwish knows Steele better than me.

How about?

Because when I was not and engaged in politics, it was Mr. Darwish who was friends with Parvin and then Steele. This sentence is well understood by those who need to know.

You said Ali Parvin. We remembered his historical sentence saying, “Technical manager means curd” …

It was a mistake. Because Ali Parvin never realized what the duties of a manager are and what he should do. Parvin is the one who wants to own it if he gets on the bus. The framework is not possible and therefore he does not want to accept the fact that the manager is not curd.

This is true of Steel, of course. Because they have not taken advantage of him and have attracted many players …

Hamid Steele is a framework. Perhaps the task description is not defined for him and maybe it is defined but not implemented. If he was the right to be upset.

Talk about the national team too?

I have talked a lot about the national team. Let them go further and see if they make changes. Then we can talk more.