Sports | Sports general
input2025-08-14 09:07:18
(Sports Seoul | Reporter Kim Yong -il) The Sports Ethics Center under the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism announced on the 14th that it ordered the athlete to drive a surrogate driving and forced the injured player to be disciplined.
The Shin said that after dinner during the tournament, he ordered a surrogate driving to bring a drunk guided official to the accommodation and demanded to drink a sleeping player and drink alcohol. In addition, he reported that he was forced to compete in the competition for the team’s grades and to make the injury worse.
Mr. A explained that it is not an unfair instruction because the player is supposed to be an additional career in addition to the players’ activities, and it is part of it because it is part of the work of bringing judo officials to the accommodation. He also argued that the player wanted to discuss the salary and the down payment first, and he did not ask for drinking and drinking a player at bedtime.
It was also because the player was forced to compel the injured player.
The Ethics Center deliberation committee decided that Mr. A demanded to drive on behalf of his or judo officials against his intention to play in the game by using the upper and lower relationships of managers and players who are difficult to reject their instructions. He also interpreted that he had had a negative impact on his career by injuring his knees by instructing him to compete in the game for team results. All of them were recognized as human rights violations until they attended drinking.
The Ethics Center said, ‘The contents of the misconduct are serious, and the situation is difficult to think of it as an accident, and the sports association’s Sports Fair Commission Regulations (Human Rights Invasion) and the Discipline Standards of the Sports Association Sports Fair Commission Regulations (Human Rights violations) and Article 31 (2) in the Sports Association Sports Fair Commission Regulations (when human rights violations occur habitually) It was judged that disciplinary action was necessary, and it was decided to request disciplinary action against Mr. A based on Article 18 of the National Sports Promotion Act. kyi0486@sportsseoul.com